You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to download our app instead?
Moneyweb Android App Moneyweb iOS App Moneyweb Mobile Web App

NEW SENS search and JSE share prices

More about the app

21.51  /  0.48%


NAV on 2021/09/17
NAV on 2021/09/16 4462.15
52 week high on 2021/08/23 4594.17
52 week low on 2020/11/02 3608.57
Total Expense Ratio on 2021/06/30 1.21
Total Expense Ratio (performance fee) on 2021/06/30 0
Incl Dividends
1 month change -0.85% -0.85%
3 month change 8.26% 8.43%
6 month change 8.34% 8.51%
1 year change 19.35% 19.61%
5 year change 14.39% 14.78%
10 year change 20.64% 21.25%
Price data is updated once a day.
Click and drag to zoom in on timeline.
  • Sectoral allocations
Liquid Assets 550.02 2.56%
Offshore 20908.89 97.44%
  • Top five holdings
MICROSOFT 807.91 3.76%
APPLE 707.43 3.3%
AMAZON.COM 417.36 1.94%
FACEBOOKINC 383.93 1.79%
ALPHABETINCA 284.23 1.32%
  • Performance against peers
  • Fund data  
Management company:
Old Mutual Unit Trust Managers (RF) (Pty) Ltd.
Formation date:
ISIN code:
Short name:
MSCI World index



  • Fund management  
Ian Heslop
Amadeo Alentorn

  • Fund manager's comment

Old Mutual Global Equity comment - Dec 19

2020/02/24 00:00:00
Investor exuberance around a combination of accommodative central bank policy and improved prospects for global trade explained most of the market returns through 2019. The close of the calendar year represented a complete reversal to how major indices ended 2018. Twelve months earlier, stocks tumbled sharply on worries about trade tensions impacting global growth, and investors feared that interest rate increases would turn a slowdown into a protracted drawdown.
Despite the sharp recovery in January 2019, it still took six months for the S&P 500 to definitively erase those year-end losses. Even allowing for seasonally low volumes exaggerating market movement, the parallels between both types of outsized market moves cannot be ignored. In the US, the S&P 500 returned in excess of 28% over the course of 2019, nearing the 29.6% growth achieved in 2013. The 2019 rally was not limited to US stocks. The euro Stoxx 600 gained 23% this year, putting it on course for its best performance in a decade. China’s Shanghai Composite was up 22%, while Japan’s Nikkei 225 rose 18%. The turnaround was driven primarily by a shift in monetary policy at the US Federal Reserve, which cut rates for the first time in a decade in July, lowering them again in September and October. Since then, the stock market’s gains have been broad. The S&P 500 set 35 record closes in 2019, the most since 2017. The tech sector led much of the advance in markets through 2019. The S&P 500’s tech sector rose 47% during the year, by far the biggest gain among the index’s 11 sectors. Nonetheless, gains were broadly distributed, with approximately 90% of the stocks in the S&P 500 having risen during the year. Improved sentiment and emboldened investor expectations followed the additional stimulus from major central banks, as demand for risk assets was boosted.
The US dollar weakened through late December as investors steered away from “safe haven” assets. The main dollar index sank to levels close to the lows of July. More recently, markets were emboldened by the apparent thaw in trade tensions, culminating in the US and China announcing a “mini” trade deal. Despite the seasonal boost to markets’ spirits, there was little evidence, however, that the Trump administration was reversing its strategy of trade and technology protectionism as a means of achieving future substantive concessions. With an election year in 2020, the market may remain wary of further uncertainties ahead. Moreover, by year-end, price mechanisms appeared to be further detached from market fundamentals. Compared with the sharp gains in US stock prices, companies in the S&P 500 have reported subpar growth in both earnings and revenue in 2019. Earnings per share growth will be just 1.4%, according to FactSet data, down from 22% in 2018. Profits are expected to grow 9.5% in 2020.
The disappointing returns were generated in an environment which continues to prove challenging for the overall investment process. The impact of blending style characteristics to determine stock forecasts continued to result in anomalous factor outcomes through 4Q19. While their predictive power persists, the inversion highlighted earlier in the year appeared to accelerate towards year-end.
Performance was weak across most stock selection criteria throughout the period. At a portfolio level, it proved challenging to blend value with a series of our other factor sets. The nature of the relationship between value and momentum detracted from the fund’s returns during the period. This was evidenced by the weaker contribution from the market dynamics factor set. As price mechanisms within the broader market demonstrated further decoupling from fundamentals, weaker returns were seen to some of our more fundamental stock selection criteria. Against this backdrop it remains too early to evaluate comprehensively the impact of the recent enhancements to the fund’s investment model, specifically those incorporating downside risk considerations into our dynamic weighting scheme.
The inversion of cross-sectional variables highlighted above was particularly pronounced in the market dynamics and dynamic valuation factor sets. This transitory effect has coincided with an extended period of deleveraging and capital outflows from a wide range of quantitative strategies. The underlying momentum strategies within market dynamics were further impacted by the effects of the broader factor unwind at the start of September. In the case of dynamic valuation, we believe the latest model enhancements will better mitigate the downside risk in periods where both value and quality go out of favour, by decreasing the weights in both. Factor sets more dependent on fundamental inputs, such as sustainable growth, were negatively impacted by the decoupling between price mechanisms and fundamentals at the market level. The analyst sentiment component, which focuses on company level information, further detracted from performance. By contrast, the company management criterion, which evaluates the nature of the underlying corporate team responsible for running companies in our investment universe, contributed positively over 2019.
  • Fund focus and objective  
The fund aims to offer superior returns over the medium to longer term by investing in shares from developed countries around the world.
This fund is suited to investors wanting to diversify their portfolios by adding an international equity component or investors who are taking a specifi c view on the performance of global equity relative to other asset classes.
The fund has a broad-based exposure to quality shares from developed countries across the globe. The fund is managed by Merian Global Investors, who aims to maximise returns by managing country and sector exposure. This fund remains as fully invested in foreign equities as possible, given regulatory constraints.
The fund aims to offer exposure to a specifi c asset class. It therefore holds a higher allocation to international assets and equities than what is allowed in terms of Regulation 28 of the Pension Funds Act. This fund is therefore not Regulation 28 compliant.

Follow us:

Search Articles:
Click a Company: