You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to download our app instead?
Moneyweb Android App Moneyweb iOS App Moneyweb Mobile Web App

NEW SENS search and JSE share prices

More about the app

1.8  /  0.22%


NAV on 2021/09/23
NAV on 2021/09/22 800.84
52 week high on 2021/06/11 835.25
52 week low on 2020/10/07 754.4
Total Expense Ratio on 2021/06/30 0.88
Total Expense Ratio (performance fee) on 2021/06/30 0
Incl Dividends
1 month change 0.03% 0.03%
3 month change -2.39% 1.71%
6 month change 4.96% 9.37%
1 year change 5.63% 14.62%
5 year change -0.44% 8.07%
10 year change 0% 8.08%
Price data is updated once a day.
Click and drag to zoom in on timeline.
  • Sectoral allocations
Derivatives 4.27 0.21%
Liquid Assets 4.17 0.20%
Money Market 23.70 1.14%
SA Bonds 2047.05 98.45%
  • Top five holdings
MONEYMARK 23.70 1.14%
FUTURES M 4.27 0.21%
  • Performance against peers
  • Fund data  
Management company:
Sanlam Collective Investments
Formation date:
ISIN code:
Short name:
South African--Interest Bearing--Variable Term
BEASSA All Bond index
No email address listed.

No website listed.


  • Fund management  
Mokgatla Madisha
Donovan van den Heever
Melville du Plessis

  • Fund manager's comment

SIM Bond Plus comment - Sep 18

2019/01/08 00:00:00
Trade war between China and the US intensified The backdrop for emerging markets (EM) deteriorated sharply during the past quarter as the global super powers (China and the US) continue to wage ‘war’ on the trade front. President Trump imposed import tariffs on another $200 billion worth of Chinese goods, to which China promptly responded with its own tariffs on $60 billion of US made goods. The Chinese Renminbi lost almost 4% against the US Dollar as the US imposed the new round of tariffs. China did not defend its currency as it usually does.
The Turkish Lira and Argentinian Peso were the worst performing currencies against the Dollar, declining by about 40%. Turkey has been in a diplomatic standoff with the US over the incarceration of an American citizen. In Argentina, investors are worried that the country may soon default on debt. The Rand traded to a low of R15.58 against the US Dollar before recovering to R14.12 as South Africa is seen by some investors as having similar vulnerabilities as Turkey, namely current deficits and a large external financing requirement.
Bond Market Review The US economy continued to outpace other developed markets (DM), growing by 4.2% in the second quarter. By comparison the Eurozone grew by 2.1%. US unemployment was at a low 3.7% in September and core inflation of 2% was in line with the US Federal Reserve (Fed)’s target. As a result, the Federal Open Market Committee raised the federal funds rate by 0.25% in September and signalled that the current policy stance is still accommodative.
US 10-year bond yields rose from 2.95% to 3.06% leading to a sell-off in other DM bond yields. In Germany and Britain 10-year bond yields rose 17 basis points (bps), while Japanese benchmark 10-year yields rose 9 bps. Bond yields in the US were pressured by increased supply and chances of more rate hikes.
In South Africa the sharp fall of the Rand and the rise in oil prices resulted in a deterioration of the inflation outlook. However, the SA Reserve Bank (SARB) decided not to increase the repo rate at the September meeting given the - 0.7% GDP outcome for the second quarter and the lower than expected 4.9% CPI for August. The yield on the benchmark R186 bond rose 11 bps during the quarter from 8.88% to 8.99%. However, the FTSE/JSE All Bond Index managed to return a positive 0.78% for the quarter as short-dated bonds offset the capital losses on long-dated bonds.
We think South African bonds offer value when the 10-year bond yield is between 8.25% and 8.50%. Credit spreads continued to compress as demand outstripped supply.
Bond Market Outlook The outlook for DM bonds remains poor given a combination of lower liquidity as central banks buy less government bonds, increasing inflation and larger deficits in the US. We think yields in the US will end 2018 closer to 3%, perhaps even a little higher. However, guidance from the European Central Bank to keep rates on hold until the end of summer 2019 will have a dampening effect on yields in Europe.
The trade war between China and the US is leading to risk aversion and capital flight toward developed markets. Oil prices have risen further and pose a threat to our constructive view on bonds.
In October the Minister of Finance will deliver the Medium Term Budget Policy Statement (MTBPS). The market will be looking for continued commitment to the expenditure ceiling and for bond issuance to remain unchanged. Government has already committed to a R50 billion stimulus package, to be announced at the MTBPS. Should this stimulus package not be financed within the expenditure framework previously announced, this would be negative. We expect the SARB to raise the repo rate by 0.25% at the November Monetary Policy Committee.
  • Fund focus and objective  
The fund offers unitholders an optimum overall yield comprising both capital growth and income. The fund invests in public and private sector bonds and deposits.
This fund is suited for institutions and individuals requiring investment growth via the capital market with a high income.
Why Choose This Fund?
* The fund provides an income stream in the form of half-yearly income payments and is therefore suitable as a core fund for persons who wish to invest in the bond market though a diversified portfolio and/or top up their income at six-monthly intervals.
* The prices may fluctuate depending upon market rates ie, if rates rise, prices go down and if rates drop, prices go up.
* The fund is actively managed in order to outperform the All Bond index.
Additional Fund Information
* The fund's name changed on 1 April 2004. The fund was previously called the Sanlam Gilt Fund.
* This fund is also available via certain LISPs (Linked Investment Services Providers), who levy their own fees.
- Total Expense Ratio (TER): This fund (retail class) has a TER of 1.19%. For the period from 1 January 2007 to 31 March 2007 1.19% of the average net asset value of the portfolio were incurred as charges, levies and fees related to the management of the portfolio. The ratio does not include the cost of acquiring assets. A higher TER does not necessarily imply a poor return, nor does a low TER imply a good return. The current TER can not be regarded as an indication of future TERs.

Follow us:

Search Articles:
Click a Company: